Мы используем файлы cookie.
Продолжая использовать сайт, вы даете свое согласие на работу с этими файлами.
H. L. v. Matheson
Другие языки:

H. L. v. Matheson

Подписчиков: 0, рейтинг: 0
H. L. v. Matheson
Argued October 6, 1980
Decided March 23, 1981
Full case name H. L. v. Scott M. Matheson, Governor of Utah, et al.
Citations 450 U.S. 398 (more)
101 S. Ct. 1164; 67 L. Ed. 2d 388; 1981 U.S. LEXIS 81
Case history
Prior 604 P.2d 907 (Utah 1979); probable jurisdiction noted, 445 U.S. 903 (1980).
Holding
A state may require a doctor to inform a teenaged girl's parents before performing an abortion or face criminal penalty.
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Potter Stewart
Byron White · Thurgood Marshall
Harry Blackmun · Lewis F. Powell Jr.
William Rehnquist · John P. Stevens
Case opinions
Majority Burger, joined by Stewart, White, Powell, Rehnquist
Concurrence Powell, joined by Stewart
Concurrence Stevens
Dissent Marshall, joined by Brennan, Blackmun

H. L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398 (1981), was a United States Supreme Court abortion rights case, according to which a state may require a doctor to inform a teenaged girl's parents before performing an abortion or face criminal penalty.

Overview

A female minor, known by her initials H.L., was living in Utah with her parents when she became pregnant in 1978. A doctor advised H.L. that an abortion would be in her best medical interests. A Utah law enacted in 1974 required abortion providers to "[n]otify, if possible" the parents of any female under the age of majority who is scheduled to undergo an abortion, at least 24 hours before the abortion. Violation was a misdemeanor subject to a fine up to $1000 and/or several months imprisonment. H.L. initiated a lawsuit as part of a proposed class action of unmarried unemancipated females, arguing that Utah's parental notification statute was unconstitutional. Scott M. Matheson, then the governor of Utah, was named as the defendant.

The case made its way to the Utah Supreme Court, where the law was upheld as consistent with Roe v. Wade (1973). The judgment noted, among other points, that H.L.'s proposed class action was overly broad; and that the Utah statute mandated parental notification but did not grant parents authority to stop such an abortion.

The case was appealed to the Supreme Court of the United States of America. Utah's statute was upheld on a 6 to 3 vote.

See also

Further reading

  • M. H. Wolff & R. H. Hawn, H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions, 19 Cal. West L. Rev. 74 (1982).
  • B. Bridge, Parent versus child: H.L. v. Matheson and the new abortion litigation, 55 Wis. L. Rev. 75 (1982).
  • M. A. Medler, H.L. v. Matheson: parental notice prior to abortion, 26 St. Louis U. L.J. 426 (1982).
  • Gail H. Miller, H. L. v. Matheson: Can Parental Notification be Required for Minors Seeking Abortions?, 16 U. Rich. L. Rev. 429 (1982).

External links


Новое сообщение