Мы используем файлы cookie.
Продолжая использовать сайт, вы даете свое согласие на работу с этими файлами.
Welfare's effect on poverty
Другие языки:

    Welfare's effect on poverty

    Подписчиков: 0, рейтинг: 0
    The relationship between poverty reduction and differing levels of welfare expense as a percentage of GDP.

    The effects of social welfare on poverty have been the subject of various studies.

    Studies have shown that in welfare states, poverty decreases after countries adopt welfare programs. Empirical evidence suggests that taxes and transfers considerably reduce poverty in most countries whose welfare states commonly constitute at least a fifth of GDP. In 2013, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development asserted that welfare spending is vital in reducing the ever-expanding global wealth gap.

    Table of effect

    Countries' income inequality as of 2018 according to their Gini coefficients.
    World map indicating the Human Development Index in 2015

    Timothy Smeeding used data from the Luxembourg Income Study to determine the effectiveness of anti-poverty and welfare programs on poverty reduction. The data for all the countries was from the year 2000 with the exception of the United Kingdom and the Netherlands for which the data was from 1999.

    Country Social expenditures on non-elderly
    (as percentage of GDP)
    Total percent of
    poverty reduced
     United States 2.3 26.4
     Netherlands 9.6 65.2
     Sweden 11.6 77.4
     Germany 7.3 70.5
     Canada 5.8 46.0
     Finland 10.9 69.7
     United Kingdom 7.1 60.1
     Belgium 9.3 76.9
     Austria 7.4 75.8
     Italy 4.3 57.7
     Ireland 5.5 44.1
    Average 7.4 60.9

    Table of poverty levels pre- and post-welfare

    The absolute poverty rates of various countries before and after their introduction of welfare
    The relative poverty rates before and after the introduction of welfare of various countries

    Two studies compare countries internationally before and after implementing social welfare programs. Using data from the Luxembourg Income Study, Bradley et al. and Lane Kenworthy measure the poverty rates both in relative terms (poverty defined by the respective governments) and absolute terms (poverty defined by 40% of United States median income), respectively. Kenworthy's study also adjusts for economic performance and shows that the economy made no significant difference in uplifting people out of poverty.

    The studies look at the different countries from 1960 to 1991 (Kenworthy) and from 1970 to 1997 (Bradley et al.). Both these periods are roughly when major welfare programs were implemented such as the War on Poverty in the United States. The results of both studies show that poverty has been significantly reduced during the periods when major welfare programs were created.

    Country Absolute poverty rate (1960–1991)
    (threshold set at 40% of United States median household income)
    Relative poverty rate

    (1970–1997)

    Pre-welfare Post-welfare Pre-welfare Post-welfare
     Sweden 23.7 5.8 14.8 4.8
     Norway 9.2 1.7 12.4 4.0
     Netherlands 22.1 7.3 18.5 11.5
     Finland 11.9 3.7 12.4 3.1
     Denmark 26.4 5.9 17.4 4.8
     Germany 15.2 4.3 9.7 5.1
     Switzerland 12.5 3.8 10.9 9.1
     Canada 22.5 6.5 17.1 11.9
     France 36.1 9.8 21.8 6.1
     Belgium 26.8 6.0 19.5 4.1
     Australia 23.3 11.9 16.2 9.2
     United Kingdom 16.8 8.7 16.4 8.2
     United States 21.0 11.7 17.2 15.1
     Italy 30.7 14.3 19.7 9.1

    See also


    Новое сообщение